erofanboy wrote:about 100 performers positive three weeks ago? it's maybe simplistic view of me but does that mean that almost everybody with a little bit of a name in the euro bizz is positive?
It is an exact estimation...
Moderator: Raytech
erofanboy wrote:about 100 performers positive three weeks ago? it's maybe simplistic view of me but does that mean that almost everybody with a little bit of a name in the euro bizz is positive?
philippe xxx wrote:Because after all, performers are young adults and they're free to have a sex life outside the sets, right ? Or maybe, some people want to prevent that too ?
Diagnosis
Syphilis is difficult to diagnose clinically early in its presentation.[8] Confirmation is either via blood tests or direct visual inspection using microscopy. Blood tests are more commonly used, as they are easier to perform.[4] Diagnostic tests are, however, unable to distinguish between the stages of the disease.[15]
Blood tests
Blood tests are divided into nontreponemal and treponemal tests.[8] Nontreponemal tests are used initially, and include venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL) and rapid plasma reagin tests. However, as these tests are occasionally false positives, confirmation is required with a treponemal test, such as treponemal pallidum particle agglutination (TPHA) or fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test (FTA-Abs).[4] False positives on the nontreponemal tests can occur with some viral infections such as varicella and measles, as well as with lymphoma, tuberculosis, malaria, endocarditis, connective tissue disease, and pregnancy.[7] Treponemal antibody tests usually become positive two to five weeks after the initial infection.[8] Neurosyphilis is diagnosed by finding high numbers of leukocytes (predominately lymphocytes) and high protein levels in the cerebrospinal fluid in the setting of a known syphilis infection.[4][7]
Direct testing
Dark ground microscopy of serous fluid from a chancre may be used to make an immediate diagnosis. However, hospitals do not always have equipment or experienced staff members, whereas testing must be done within 10 minutes of acquiring the sample. Sensitivity has been reported to be nearly 80%, thus can only be used to confirm a diagnosis but not rule one out. Two other tests can be carried out on a sample from the chancre: direct fluorescent antibody testing and nucleic acid amplification tests. Direct fluorescent testing uses antibodies tagged with fluorescein, which attach to specific syphilis proteins, while nucleic acid amplification uses techniques, such as the polymerase chain reaction, to detect the presence of specific syphilis genes. These tests are not as time-sensitive, as they do not require living bacteria to make the diagnosis.[8]
STEMCELL wrote:Don´t repeat your silly testing regime argument
pagangod_uk wrote:It must be said that there is a certain logic in the notion that the possible source of the current outbreak being attributed to those performers who make an extra income as prostitutes/escorts/whatever...
Sodomizeher wrote:pagangod_uk wrote:It must be said that there is a certain logic in the notion that the possible source of the current outbreak being attributed to those performers who make an extra income as prostitutes/escorts/whatever...
I'm sure that when working as escorts they will practice safer sex, using condoms for all penetration (vaginal and anal) and often using a condom for oral sex as well so I think this is either scare-mongering or an attempt to deflect attention elsewhere.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests