The Christoph Clark Thread

[ogpaps]

Don't worry Mr.Peter, the REDcam is on its way...

[Vulture]

The only slightly worrying thing in AP14 was a (brief, thankfully) section where David Perry does some throat grabbing on (I think) Gitta Blond. So out of character too as Perry has always been one of those who treats the women with great respect. Just indicative of this cancer that is spreading into even the healthy areas of porn now, I suppose.

Hope you keep a tight rein on this personally Christoph. It's just deeply unpleasant, not erotic at all.

[Christoph Clark]

The only slightly worrying thing in AP14 was a (brief, thankfully) section where David Perry does some throat grabbing on (I think) Gitta Blond. So out of character too as Perry has always been one of those who treats the women with great respect. Just indicative of this cancer that is spreading into even the healthy areas of porn now, I suppose.

Hope you keep a tight rein on this personally Christoph. It's just deeply unpleasant, not erotic at all.

i agree,maby iam old fashion but when i see all the new way of love ,everywhere iam a little surprise,,,for me now to be actor is behind me but i could easily do somes very nice scene whitout all that cinema,,,

[BigTall]

...David Perry does some throat grabbing on (I think) Gitta Blond. So out of character too as Perry has always been one of those who treats the women with great respect.

Wait, are you talking about the same David Perry that spits on half the women's faces after he cums on them (usually because he doesn't have enough sperm to make a good facial).

But I do agree, no need for the choking or any of the sadist stuff! Leave that to their own fetish movies and sites, not your great work!

[chris]

^Wait,hands down from my friend Perry
He is very cool guy and great performer of course.

[Winston]

Are there any news updates that can be shared concerning the launch
of the new Clark website?

Have any dates been set?..or targeted?

Will the website be featuring any behind the scenes footage or BTS features?

[stef de bef]

I know that in Christoph's movies the most girls out europe take a place in his movies but a i missing one very nasty girl that do anal and dp and that is the amazing Nikky Thorne
Is it too late Chris to prove she is a very dirty girl for your movies

[chris]

I just watched her newest scene with 3 guys in eurosexparties episode so i second that,she's nasty as hell.

[Mr_White]

Yes i know she is fantastic i wonder why Christoph had not brining her in his movies

[Mr_White]

Folks, I absolutely second the votes about Nikky Thorne: Mr. Clarke really should book her!!!

But, nevertheless, please stop quoting the post which is directly above yours. Thanks, gentlemen.

[joe black]

look at this i think its come from him


*** REMOVED ***

[gapelover]

look at this i think its come from him


*** REMOVED ***

Oh yes its ripped for free on Tube
The death of all good porn.

[ogpaps]

Some is sharing, it's always nice.

[Winston]

Are there any news updates that can be shared concerning the launch
of the new Clark website?

Have any dates been set?..or targeted?

Will the website be featuring any behind the scenes footage or BTS features?

Any news? (....please see the questions quoted just up above.)

[Mr. Peter]

I think all the good hardcore stuff now has already lost the original filmography technical qualities.
Look those all the same boring camera angles, uninteresting flat lighting, terrible, really terrible sketchy and choppy editing which kills the atmosphere, etc...theres big potential in girls and hot sex ruined by bad shots.

do you think today the kind of technical qualities you desire is very important ?????? so many bulshit around and nobody is complaining,,,,just a question mr peter,,,also i really think my camera do a good job,if you was talking also for me,,

Dear Christoph,
sure you know that originally porn movies were shot by people from cinematoghaphic world (excluding amateur movies). Logically
those materials had some degree of technical quality in cinematographic means. Later on the world has slowly split into two worlds:


1/ Rather soft, many times big budget movies delivering among porn both high technical and artistical qualities - thats what Digital Playground, Playboy, some Private lines..do now
2/ Whats I call "Jerk-Off" movies - focused on the actual sexual intercourse, on the action, bringing the highest possible degree of sex and erotic feelings right in from of the viewers face without any hesitations, pure hardcore. The foundation of gonzo style was surely a big hit on this part of market.

But now I think we came to the point that the camera and editing is so bad that you cant even call it jerk-off movie, beacuse the technical aspects broke the build up of the sexual heat made by the ongoing action. Those complaints about unexcpected cuts, bad shots where you cant see what you should see are a proof...Im really upset, because the girls are delivering still great performances.

To aswer your question, I really dont thing that technical aspects are very important, but they have to support the primary purpose of the porn movie - to bring a pleasure, to build up sexual heat, to turn on the viewer..., but not to bring it down.

You are right about the bullshit around but thats the problem - first of all people got used to the bullshit and second they have no other option - they are not shooting the movies, they rely on
whats being coming up and they got used to it.

But as you can notice between the lines people are complaining. So Im saying that we must to try to make the movies better, more enjoyable and most serving their primal purpose.

Speaking of your movies - Im sorry I didnt watch much of your recent movies but I have seen some Angel Perverse and Euro DOmination titles but even from the trailers of the new movies I can see a lot. I see that editing can be improved - its too much choppy, unexpected, unlogical. The scenes focuse too much on the set to make it beautiful, colors etc, too much on the cloths, but forgeting a little about the sexual heat. Its like a great nasty music video. But can you jerk-off on the music video?
Generally the key is that the viewer is expecting something to see but the editing its not delivering it . If there will be a surprise in the shot its ok, but theres rather a frustration of not seeing it. I know you are trying to make a perfect picture and the scene, where I can see a huge improvement over old Euro Angels serie.