Page 1 of 1

Re: Jennifer Mackay

PostPosted: Tue Sep 30, 2014 12:37 pm
by kingofitall

Re: Jennifer Mackay

PostPosted: Tue Sep 30, 2014 5:40 pm
by sbando
Fucking hell... That looks quite expensive :).

Image


http://www.eurobabeindex.com/sbandoinde ... ermac.html

Re: Jennifer Mackay

PostPosted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 10:31 am
by sbando
gapegourmand wrote:ufff, almost perfect 10

but, what shall i do with soft??? buying clips and pictures? LOLLL



That's what a lot of people, like myself, still do.

Re: Jennifer Mackay

PostPosted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 4:03 pm
by Goldstar
Am0rIn0 wrote:it is a question of offer and demand. if nobody would spend money on solo stuff all these super models would need to do bg.


Interesting point of view but unfortunately so true.
If you think of it, met-art/petter hegre and similar nude/solo photography sites became big players since the early to mid 2000's.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MET-Art

It's from this time that similar "artsy fartsy" sites blossomed.
It's also from this time on that you just don't see extremely beautiful girls any longer in hardcore boy/girl.
I mean, the ongoing female model talent (also more natural blondes) of private/woodman in the golden 90s was bizarre. Many of those girls would choose a "safe" career in solo/nude photography now for sure. Models get paid well and many customers pay well for a subscription. Future non-porn career of the girl is guaranteed (no porn stigma for "nude art photos") and everybody happy. Of course, internet/social media going mainstream and the thus fear for harassment/stalking/outing plays a big role too.

Personally, I wish more people were like me and see collecting material of girls who will never do boys on cam as a waste of money.
Then the circle will be round and we'll see them popping up in hardcore porn again just like you said.
If I want to see beautiful girls, I go buy eastern european Playboy. At least I will also have articles to read in stead of only watching nudie pictures of a nice looking woman (one of hundreds of millions). If this would be my call, I would make "ebi2" and place all the girls there who only do solo/nudephotography (and perhaps soft lesbo).

Re: Jennifer Mackay

PostPosted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 4:14 pm
by sbando
And I wish the forum could go back to its origins, everything seems to revolve around extreme sex. This DOES NOT represent EBI!

Re: Jennifer Mackay

PostPosted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 6:26 pm
by sbando
You can create a thread about this subject, this thread here is for contributions only.


::Anyway::

Please, stop comparing everything to legalporno or extreme sex in general. Comments are not mandatory!! Let each poster judge what it's better for them.

Re: Jennifer Mackay

PostPosted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 8:15 pm
by alexxx
Wow, what a top model! At least we can enjoy some of her body...

Re: Jennifer Mackay

PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 7:48 am
by gapegourmand
sbando wrote:And I wish the forum could go back to its origins, everything seems to revolve around extreme sex. This DOES NOT represent EBI!


to go in the past? i live in the present tense. but it is true, extreme sex like in a lot of movies i don't need.

i say it again, movies like, anita pearl fresh on cock are for me a good midle way.

i like EBI very much. especially when i find a link to superbeauty and she let fuck her ass......sorry!

Re: Jennifer Mackay

PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 10:51 am
by sbando
Every goddam thread is about whether a model will work for Legalporno or not! EBI is about pretty girls (in porn or just naked), so softcore models have their reason to be here. It's been like that for 11 years. I have nothing against a discussion about the pros and cons of glamour sites vs. porn sites, but not in every soft model's thread! Jeebus :D !

Opap, worry not, let's keep indexing these marvelous creatures.

Re: Jennifer Mackay

PostPosted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 9:28 pm
by robuk
Jesus she is pretty.