Camarillobrillo wrote:^ Well, we had guessed it from quite some times...Like Am0rIn0 said: "Emily is a 9,5 out of 10,everthing
above 9/10 will never consider bg once they started solo."
Gerald 78 wrote:Do not see her in hard porn and there are many examples from many other soft modeling/soft porn stars.
Gerald 78 wrote:According to her this is not the career she wants to follow, but then that is what many have said before her. Do not see her in hard porn and there are many examples from many other soft modeling/soft porn stars.
erotic_dude wrote:Not sure if I agree with the transition from solo to bg. I think Emily is an exception and she would have got a lot of opportunties doing solo. A lot of solo girls have then moved to gg and that remains the limit for them possibly because they have a man in their lives and bg is never an option.
Camarillobrillo wrote:^ Well, we had guessed it from quite some times...Like Am0rIn0 said: "Emily is a 9,5 out of 10,everthing
above 9/10 will never consider bg once they started solo."
And we also guessed the probable adventuring in gg territory...
Camarillobrillo wrote:Anyway, i don't know what's so difficult to understand. She's way more beautiful than most of the other
girls in the business, otherwise we wouldn't all be here talking, and as such she get plenty of work
just doing solo shots.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests