PremiumBukkake.com Discussion Thread

[horsepower]

Chloe Lapiedra #2 coming up soon....

The attachment Chloe Lapiedra.jpg is no longer available

---------------------------------------------

Btw, seems like Isabella #1 has been deleted from the site, hmmm...

ALL Isabella has been delete from the site. What gives?!? Again, more sneaky, underhanded shit.

Also Gregorious, I can't understand why you had an issue with the camera work? You don't think this is professional?

G and the Apes.jpg (35.69 KiB) Viewed 1535 times

[bigload]

Chloe is such a cute cum receptacle. However the scene once again would have been much better with a scooper because….

IMG_6738.jpeg (32.7 KiB) Viewed 1535 times

IMG_6740.jpeg (29.31 KiB) Viewed 1535 times

IMG_6743.png (200.4 KiB) Viewed 1535 times

Man Chloe with a 100+ loads scene, scooper and perfect cam1 angle, why couldnt they make it cum true

[piranorton]

Image views counter also is broken here

It's related to the other problem, attachment counters are increased after the topic view counter, but the code stops at the error. Once it's fixed, all missing functionalities will be back (like the #unread link, which is also handled after increasing the topic view counter).

ALL Isabella has been delete from the site. What gives?!? Again, more sneaky, underhanded shit.

I assume the model asked them to remove her scenes and they kindly did so, without short notice. I have not watched it in its entirety, but nobody reported anything suspicious (she was 1000% not underage, lol). I think it's normal procedure everywhere and I cannot imagine any other sites communicating these events with the members.

[Gregorious]

^Yep, I agree about Isabella, one can only assume they had a good reason to remove it, could be different things. Of course it can be annoying for anyone that don't have the videos downloaded, but there's nothing obviously 'sneaky" about it, only unfortunate.

For my part I think she was one of the more interesting models to watch.

[Robbert1977]

Hi all just watched 21yo Chloe Lapiedra #2 BUKKAKE - it is recorded on the same day as #1. Chloe is enthusiastic but not able to swallow 100plus loads in 1 day for the moment. Her limit is for that day at about 80plus loads. But maybe she could swallow next time more ?

Cam1 problem and multiple cocks are also again present obviously. I think new camera man / woman has just started. Hopefully the PB team do some evaluations and implement their learnings from internal and external feedback.

Today the message that 29yo Marsianna Amoon - 110 loads left the porn business.

[Playabuoy]

imagine this chick on pb
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/arti ... ecord.html

[bigload]

imagine this chick on pb
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/arti ... ecord.html

a 50+ mouth full

[coil]

[abano1]

This is great. Look how much of the frame is washed out white space, the floor in the background. Glad we got so much of this guy's torso too. That's important. It's a shame Chloe is dead center, but G and the Apes don't usually make this mistake (having the model in the center of the shot). At least she's far enough away you can barely make out the cum shooting in her mouth. Thank goodness for the "New Era" of PB.

7ye7efhf.jpg (69.91 KiB) Viewed 1535 times

Can you believe they used to film these PB scenes like this?! What were they thinking?!?

7tyt7t.jpg (113.08 KiB) Viewed 1535 times

[HornySoldier]

Chloe Lapiedra #2 coming up soon....

Chloe Lapiedra.jpg

---------------------------------------------

Btw, seems like Isabella #1 has been deleted from the site, hmmm...

It's not the first time they delete whole pages. I'm simply downloading everything.
But, this is still very interesting, kinda what's the story behind it.

[xtripsnova]

Jazmin the scooper with 54 loads posted.
But who is her scooper?

[WAO137]

^ https://premiumbukkake.com/trailers/PB_376_njberib_jazminsweet.mp4

Jazmin Sweet.jpg (218.96 KiB) Viewed 1535 times

Jazmin Sweet 2.jpg (203.32 KiB) Viewed 1535 times

Jazmin Sweet 3.jpg (217.29 KiB) Viewed 1535 times

Jazmin Sweet 4.jpg (237.17 KiB) Viewed 1535 times

Jazmin Sweet 5.jpg (230.68 KiB) Viewed 1535 times

Jazmin Sweet 6.jpg (218.83 KiB) Viewed 1535 times

[WAO137]

Jazmin Sweet 7.jpg (224.06 KiB) Viewed 1535 times

Jazmin Sweet 8.jpg (212.24 KiB) Viewed 1535 times

Jazmin Sweet 9.jpg (219.02 KiB) Viewed 1535 times

Jazmin Sweet 10.jpg (240.63 KiB) Viewed 1535 times

Jazmin Sweet 11.jpg (214.88 KiB) Viewed 1535 times

Jazmin Sweet 12.jpg (210.43 KiB) Viewed 1535 times

[robot]

Not sure, how you're faring, but in case you'be been stuck, the problem is that phpBB was not designed to have topics with more than 16777215 views, which is the maximum value for unsigned mediumint columns. One solution would be altering the db schema:

Code: Select all

ALTER TABLE `phpbb_topics` MODIFY `topic_views` INT UNSIGNED NOT NULL DEFAULT 0;

This shouldn't be too taxing with less than 30k topics, depends on the hardware and MySQL version. If you used a different prefix for the tables, then you also need to change the table name accordingly.

Second solution would be to close this topic and open a new one. Hope it helped a little.

Hello Mr Piranorton (Pirate Norton?
Thanks a lot for the tips and the code snippet.
I can't get into more details (unusual, lol) but you're right and unfortunately I cannot use first option. Second option I'll leave if I can't find a workaround. Hoping to solve that the proper way, though.
Lastly, since PBKK is a huge debtor of mine (and towards others it seems), my incentive to solve this at any cost is kinda non-existent But for the sake of the forum/thread posters I will do it. You guys are nuts (hehe) but you rock

[piranorton]

I can't get into more details (unusual, lol) but you're right and unfortunately I cannot use first option. Second option I'll leave if I can't find a workaround. Hoping to solve that the proper way, though.

Yep, I kind of expected that the first solution is a bit much.
A third solution may be just to find the topic in the database and zero the view count field. This can be done safely with any database manager (I guess you use PMA or something similar) and does not affect other records. Then it'll be good for another 7 years.