Page 1 of 2

Add for Avril

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 7:05 am
by Iggi
Ok this beauty has one additional anal scene to be he added to her career with master Frank in:

Exxxtraordinary Eurobabes 6 (Anal) 21 Sextury

Cheers

Iggi

PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 12:10 pm
by chris
Avril is back.

add
grandpasfuckteens.com
dominatedgirls.com

Re: Add for Avril

PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 4:57 pm
by UsainBolt

Re: Add for Avril

PostPosted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 11:55 pm
by chris

Re: Add for Avril

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 1:20 am
by hopless3
chris wrote:@ mood-pictures.com
http://www.mood-pictures.com/mp_gal.php?id=70



That link is Horrible. Why would we want to see a girl bleading because of her porn?

Re: Add for Avril

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:43 am
by robot
hopless3 wrote:
chris wrote:@ mood-pictures.com
http://www.mood-pictures.com/mp_gal.php?id=70



That link is Horrible. Why would we want to see a girl bleading because of her porn?

that link is sick. chris i know you're doing this out of completeness (i think) but please refrain from posting that kind of links again. EBI doesnt list violence/rape websites and i will keep it like that. thanks in advance

Re: Add for Avril

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 12:40 pm
by chris
robot wrote:
hopless3 wrote:
chris wrote:@ mood-pictures.com
http://www.mood-pictures.com/mp_gal.php?id=70



That link is Horrible. Why would we want to see a girl bleading because of her porn?

that link is sick. chris i know you're doing this out of completeness (i think) but please refrain from posting that kind of links again. EBI doesnt list violence/rape websites and i will keep it like that. thanks in advance


No problem bunny,you know that i respect your opinion.

Re: Add for Avril

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:01 pm
by robot
chris wrote:No problem bunny,you know that i respect your opinion.

thanks Chris/...
but i m curious, do you think it s okay to post/promote such websites? i mean, i have nothing against violence, i m a sucker for cage fights and other bloody entertainment, i just think it's crossing the sex zone over to the dark zone. sex, yeah, violence, yeah, sex+violence, uh, no...

Re: Add for Avril

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:13 pm
by sly
The girls are crank too!!!!!

why do this nice beautiful girls a film like this???
this is no porno.... this is sick.....

that really hurts more than a assfuck or other porn things

Re: Add for Avril

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:43 pm
by paroxysmia
This type of porn is a niche and the niche is fetish spanking & caning. It can be soft spanking or hard spanking with huge hematomas and sometimes blood.

This is not true violence because these girls accept to do this performance and are paid for that.

All the tastes are in the nature, and all is relative. :mrgreen:

Re: Add for Avril

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 11:47 pm
by chris
robot wrote:
chris wrote:No problem bunny,you know that i respect your opinion.

thanks Chris/...
but i m curious, do you think it s okay to post/promote such websites? i mean, i have nothing against violence, i m a sucker for cage fights and other bloody entertainment, i just think it's crossing the sex zone over to the dark zone. sex, yeah, violence, yeah, sex+violence, uh, no...


Bunny
To promote not but to post yes as it's part of porn(even if we don't like it).
I know that sounds same(post/promote)but for me it's not.

but as i said,i will not post any info of this site again :wink:

Re: Add for Avril

PostPosted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 2:04 pm
by Rosseau
chris wrote:To promote not but to post yes as it's part of porn(even if we don't like it).
I know that sounds same(post/promote)but for me it's not.

but as i said,i will not post any info of this site again :wink:


With all due respect, but I think that this is hypocritical.

People like Robot are apparently fine with posting stuff they like (facials, anal, whatever), but as soon as it's a kind of porn they don't like, they call it "sick" and want to banish it from the site. BDSM and spanking videos aren't "sick", okay? Sadomasochism is not a sickness, either. People who are into it don't tend towards violence, they don't have any psychological disturbances, they just get off on a different kink than "vanillas". Read a couple of psychology books before you condemn others just because they are into different things than you are! Sorry if I sound huffy, but the kind of intolerance and ignorance I see here makes ME sick.

Why should it not be "okay" to promote a site like Mood Pictures? Everything they do is legal and consensual, the girls do these videos out of their own free choice and know what they are getting themselves into. A caning, even if there is blood, does not do any permanent damage and is actually less dangerous, from a medical point of view, than a double anal penetration, for instance. Morally speaking, there isn't any real difference to other kinds of porn.

Of course, most of the girls in Mood videos are not actually into BDSM or caning. They do it only for the money. But it's the same with most other porn, isn't it? Do you honestly believe that the girls enjoy doing DAP's or swallowing the sperm of 5+ different guys at once? I doubt that they do! 99% of them do it all only for the money. And that's okay, it's their own decision - what matters is that everything is safe and consensual, and that is the case with Mood Pictures, too.

Okay, enough ranting. I like EBI, but frankly, I think some people here on the forums are total hypocrites. "Everything I like is fine, but I have no tolerance for what others like!" That is a double standard. Just because you don't understand a certain kind of porn, just because it goes against you personal sense of taste, doesn't mean that it's sick, immoral or that it should be banned.

If you call spanking videos sick (which are produced by consenting adults in a perfectly legal manner), how can you defend yourself against anti-porn people who say that all "normal" porn (which is also produced by consenting adults) is also sick? Hmm?

Re: Add for Avril

PostPosted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 11:06 pm
by robot
rosseau, although i understand your point, i disagree with it.
it's not double anal against facial, or anal against pissing.
i'm sure a lot of people think pissing is gross, and a lot of people think anal is perverted. different opinions, different perspectives.
i dont like gapes, i dont like dap, do you see me ban those threads?
i'm just drawing the line at violence. i don't see how this is hypocritical at all. are you saying there should be no line at all, or what is legal in some countries (scat, zoo, rape, etc...) should be promoted evenly on the net and in EBI?
whether or not i'm right or wrong, we can debate. you've got the right to appreciate canning, flogging, etc. I'm entitled to say "EBI will not promote that kind of things". post against it, lobby against it, revolt against it, express your feelings... fine... you're a free man. eventually, you'll have to deal with it :wink:

Re: Add for Avril

PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:12 am
by IMaRetArd
pissing or whatever.....i still think this is just wrong. Fake or not doesnt matter, its still wrong. In my world this is not part of pleasure, but others (sm-ppl) might think this is harmless.

opinions r like aholes...everyone has one :P

Re: Add for Avril

PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 11:27 am
by Rosseau
robot wrote:i'm just drawing the line at violence. i don't see how this is hypocritical at all. are you saying there should be no line at all, or what is legal in some countries (scat, zoo, rape, etc...) should be promoted evenly on the net and in EBI?


What you see in those movies is consensual, so it's not "violence" in the true sense of the word - violence implies an assault against someone's will.

I don't condone zoo, because that involves animals and animals cannot consent the way a human being can. The same goes for children, obviously - they are not mature enough psychologically or physically to cosent to sexual acts the way an adult can, so child porn is immoral. As for everything else - scat, (simulated) rape - , yes, I think it should be on the net. As long as it is between consenting adults and no permanent damage is done to any of them, I don't see a problem with it. I may not like all of it (like scat, which I personally find gross, and I'm not really into rape, either). But I don't have to watch it, do I? So, why shouldn't there be sites and resources for people who like that sort of thing?

whether or not i'm right or wrong, we can debate. you've got the right to appreciate canning, flogging, etc. I'm entitled to say "EBI will not promote that kind of things". post against it, lobby against it, revolt against it, express your feelings... fine... you're a free man. eventually, you'll have to deal with it :wink:


Sure, that is your own decision. You choose to promote, or not to promote, what you wish. I just think that banishing canings / floggings from the site with the arguments you use is problematic, and it could also come back to haunt you.

If someone says: "Anal is fine, but DAP's are sick!" What do you answer? "Oh, but it's all between consenting adults. The actresses do it out of their own free will." "Yeah, but I still think it's sick. I'm drawing the line at DAP's!" You see, as soon as you make personal taste (not morals!) the arbiter of what is "okay", you will also find it difficult to defend your own personal taste against those people who disagree with it.

Anyway, I can see that you want EBI to cater mostly to "vanilla" tastes, and that is okay. As I said, it's your own decision. But then don't come complaining to me when the government wants to ban all porn with the simple justification that it is "sick" and that they don't like it. :wink: