robot wrote:Geeeeeeeeeeeezz, you really are making me work tonight!
Hey, that is what you are paid for! (Aren't you?)
...well, in this case, think what you want, but my opinion is that EBI will be actively engaged in the moral decaying of society.
The whole thing ("do I like caning movies, do I not like caning movies") comes down to a matter of personal
taste, not morals. I have already pointed this out to you several times, but you apparently fail to get your head around it. As long as a video is produced by consenting adults and no permanent harm comes to any of the participants, there is no
moral problem whatsoever - if you think there is, please point out to me what it is.
If you opened a grocery store, I think you'd be quite entitled to choose which products you want to sell, regardless of the many diverse customer taste out there, and if for some reason you don't like the way pumpkins smell, then you'd choose not to sell them, even during halloween. I bet a lot of people would look at you funny if you tried to explain to them.
Sure I understand the grocery store analogy. But your customers will indeed look at you funny when you have apples, but not bananas, and when you give them a very bizarre explanation as to why: "I don't like fruit." "But you already have apples!" "Well, that is different..." And maybe they will eventually stop shopping with you altogether because they think you are a bit funny in the head.
i put caning very close to the rape/fantasy rape/torture/serial-killer/snuff sites. I can see you jump from here
and you will see me oppose to that stuff. always.
There is nothing wrong with fantasy rape or fantasy snuff as long as it is produced by consenting adults and no one is harmed. It's not my kind of taste, but I have no problem with it existing or with it being on EBI.
I find it hilarious how on the one hand EBI promotes a lot of sites and movies that contain some pretty vicious stuff (gagging, face-slapping, double anal penetrations, spitting, pissing, gangbang etc., even "light" spanking and BDSM), and you make money from it, but when it comes to caning or fantasy rape, you get on your high horse and lecture about "the moral decaying of society". It's why I imagine bakerboy used the adjective "hypocritical".
If you oppose all "violence", even where it is staged and consensual and not really violence at all, then why is funnybdsm.com on EBI? Or houseoftaboo.com? Or brutalcatfight.com? Girls get spanked and whipped there, and I've even seen some rape scenarios. It would seem that you are not at all consistent in applying your standards.
that's a good example of twisting right there. You just decided that zoo is problematic, and "different", and coprophagy is ok...
I've explained why zoo is different and indeed a lot more problematic than spanking / caning. The legal situation is a lot more problematic, as is the ethical one - animals are obviously not human beings, so they cannot consent to sex acts the way people can.
So I think it's a very valid and easily understood argument. Where does the "twisting" part come in?
But, anyway, as bakerboy said - I agree that it is time to move on with the debate. I respect your point of view and I appreciate you taking the time to try and clarfiy it, even though you've still failed to be consistent in your arguments in my view.